Same Sex Marriage And Parenting - 999 Words

Same-Sex Marriage and Parenting Same-sex marriage and same-sex parenting are comparatively new controversial topics in today’s world and its â€Å"mainstream† morality. I was not exposed to any homosexual â€Å"lifestyle† while growing up. While I know that I am firmly traditional in my theological views, nevertheless, I firmly believe that traditional marriage and traditional parenting are devotional commitments between a man and a woman. Therefore, same-sex marriage and same-sex parenting are to me, issues concerning a society with strong traditional cultural identities. It seems that homosexuals feel excluded from society because heterosexuals are intolerant of gay cultural practices. I also firmly believe that same-sex couples should not be able to adopt because the homosexuality of the relationship would have an adverse influence and impact on the adopted child. Same-sex couples should not have the legal right to adopt because it limits the children, and their ability to explore and to ex press their individuality and orientation. What I mean is that, by having same-sex parents, the adopted children are deprived of a fully informed choice to determine decisive roles and sexual orientation. Same-sex couples should have the right to personally express who they are and how they are feeling; however, not through their marriage and adoptive parenting. They lately seem to be obsessed with their world and creating an environment to force us to notice them by their â€Å"flamboyant†Show MoreRelatedSame Sex Marriage And Parenting938 Words   |  4 PagesSame-Sex Marriage and Parenting Gay and lesbian couples wish to get married for many of the equivalent reasons that heterosexual couples wish to for love, constant companionship, and to create a nuclear family environment. A survey of same-sex marriage and same-sex parenting reveals several challenges facing gay and lesbian couples, most noticeable being the stereotyping their lifestyles, parenting, and gay beliefs. In the United States, marriage egalitarianism has started to structure itself.Read MoreSame Sex Marriage And Marriage948 Words   |  4 PagesSame-sex marriage and same-sex parenting are comparatively new controversial topics in today’s world and its â€Å"mainstream† morality. I was not exposed to any homosexual â€Å"lifestyle† while growing up. I know that I am strongly traditional in my theological views, nevertheless, I vigorously believe that traditional marriage and parenting are devotional commitments between a man and a woman. Therefore, same-sex marriage and parenting ar e to me, issues of a society with strong traditional cultural identitiesRead MoreSame Sex Marriage Should Be Legal958 Words   |  4 PagesAs of June 26th, 2015, same-sex marriage is legal. The landmark Supreme Court case caused much controversy over the ruling. Many are rejoicing over the freedom to marry whoever they desire, proclaiming a recently popular phrase, â€Å"love wins.† However, there are some who strongly oppose the ruling; many disagree due to opinion and religious beliefs. Some are reluctant to accept this change because they do not like the idea of a sterile marriage where biologically producing children on their own isRead More Social and Legal Obstacles of Gay and Lesbian Parenting Essay1677 Words   |  7 PagesSocial and Legal Obstacles of Gay and Lesbian Parenting In the last decade there has been a rise in the number of lesbians and gay men forming their own families. Many do this through adoption, foster care, artificial insemination, and other means. Today, researchers have estimated that the number of children living with one gay or lesbian parent is six to fourteen million. Some have described this current period as a lesbian and gay â€Å"baby boom†. However, lesbian and gay parents face many socialRead MoreSame Sex Marriage Should Be Legal Essay1072 Words   |  5 PagesSame sex marriage Same sex marriage also known as gay marriage is the union between two of the same gender having all legal rights allotted to this agreement in a given jurisdiction. According to opponents of same sex marriages such unions are more of abandonment of gender since one cannot be in the said union and still believe gender is important. Supporters of same sex marriage however refer to same sex unions as marriage equality. Same sex marriages challenge the traditional meaning of marriageRead MoreEssay about Opposition Toward Same Sex Marriage883 Words   |  4 PagesMany arguments against same sex marriage are based on religion. Orthodox Christians, for example, view marriage as a reunion of the essence of man and the essence of woman as portrayed in the book of Genesis. The bible statesâ€Å" If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.† (The NIV Study Bible, Lev 20.1 3). The United States however was not founded on, and is not ran upon, the laws ofRead MoreHow Changes Of Marriage And Family Will Change American Society949 Words   |  4 PagesChanges to Marriage and Family will change American Society Temitope Layode DeVry University PHIL 447 Spring 2016 How Changes to Marriage and Family will change American Society Over time, the American society has derailed from the traditional reason and forms of marriage and family set up. The American society acceptance of non-marital childbearing (single parenting), same- sex marriage has led to the trending poverty rate in average families. The main objective of the institution of marriage was meantRead MoreTrends in Family Formation Supporting Same Sex Marriage 1193 Words   |  5 Pageschallenges. These have caused young people to question whether the traditional way of doing things is practical in the twenty first century and many do not intend on following their parents’ footsteps in relation to marriage and parenting (Morrison, Headrick, Wasoff Morton, 2004). Marriages and heterosexual relationships in the current world are in the process of change. In the past, these were created and nurtured in such a way that they lasted for many years, with the intention of being life longRead MoreThe Debate Over Same Sex Parenting1435 Words   |  6 Pages The debate over same-sex parenting and same sex couples being capable of raising healthy children in the United States is a contentious one, speakers on both sides continue to work hard to have their voices heard. Some believe that being raised by same sex couples will cause the children to pursue same sex relationships in the future. The supreme court has been working towards equality and listening to arguments on the rights for same-sex couples to not only marry but to adopt and raise childrenRead MoreEssay on Same-Sex Parenting and Child Development1110 Words   |  5 PagesSame-Sex Parenting In the last ten years, many established gay men and lesbians have been increasingly undertaking parenthood through donor insemination, surrogacy, or fostering and adoption (McCann, 2005). Thus, a new type of family formation in American society has been generated. Due to the formation of same-sex households, gay and lesbian parenting is no longer a concept. This type of parenting has become a reality which society as a whole is struggling to accept (McCann, 2005). In 2010

Act V Excerpt From The Play A Streetcar Named Desire

This Act V excerpt from the play is part of an argument between Doctor Relling and Gregers Werle, over whether or not preserving this blissful ignorance can sometimes be the best course of action if the knowledge of the truth is too difficult to face. Blanche, in A Streetcar Named Desire, is heavily relatable to the characters in The Wild Duck because of her fearful approach to the truth and decision to live in a state of blissful ignorance, which is why the excerpts are paired next to each other. Blanche tells to Mitch that she lies because she cannot accept many truths of her situation. Creating an illusion to herself and other people in her life allows her to turn her life into what it should be rather than what it is. Stanley, more of a realist, despises Blanche’s fabrications and does everything he can to unravel them. Blanche and Stanley’s somewhat antagonistic relationship is a struggle between blissful ignorance and the burden of knowledge. When Blanche gets to New Orleans, she decides that she must keep others unaware of her struggles and pretend she is on vacation so nobody would think less of her, and she would not have to face the consequences of the truth of her situation. She continuously has baths so no one would see her dirty or tired, and she believes she is too old and uses the darkness to shield herself. In this passage, the truth finally comes out. She reveals that she misleads people because she wants to give them magic, instead of difficult, or evenShow MoreRelatedProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 Pageswith teaching awards from both the Oregon State University MBA program and the University of Oregon Executive MBA program. He has been a member of the Portland, Oregon, chapter of the Project Management Institute since 1984. In 1995 he worked as a Fulbright scholar with faculty at the Krakow Academy of Economics on modernizing Polish business education. In 2005 he was a visiting professor at Chulalongk orn University in Bangkok, Thailand. He received a B.A. in psychology from Claremont McKenna College

Socrates vs Sophists free essay sample

Socrates and the Sophists (Platos Dialogues) In chapter 4, The Sophist: Protagoras, Soccio does an excellent job discussing a group of teachers and thinkers known collectively as sophists, and the social environment in which they flourished for a time. These professional educators were known for being widely travelled and thus having much experience with other cultures. This experience convinced many of them that there is no such thing as objective standards; we merely have a set of culturally determined beliefs and behaviors. Thus, there is no reason to suppose that one set of cultural values is superior to anothers, i. e. , we have cultural relativism. Most sophists then went on to extend this kind of relativism to morality as well (see the lecture on Moral Relativism! ). The sophists are most notable for being opposed by Socrates and Plato. That is, both Socrates and Plato disagreed with the sophists relativist views and perceived them as a danger to any community of rational people. Thus, many of Platos early and middle dialogues are specific arguments against the views of the sophists. (Although, it seems clear that some of his contemporaries considered Socrates, himself, a sophista view that I would strongly disagree with! ) Before going on to Socrates arguments and claims against the sophists, it would be well to discuss some of the more notable characteristics of the sophists. I. The SophistsTeachers of the art of persuasion by rhetoric in courts of law and politics: A. Secularistsskeptical or cynical of religion. Although none of these men grew up in an atheistic culture, their experience with the variety different cultures and religions in the Mediterranean and Aegean communities and their keen use of reason to examine these various cultures, convinced them that there is no compelling reason to favor one religion over another. This lead to a skepticism toward any supposed truth to be found in religion. Many older sophists, such as Protagoras, respected religion as a kind of social control, necessary for any large aggregate of people to co-exist. Thus, while skeptical of the religious claims, themselves, these sophists still supported and encouraged organized religion as promoting social cohesion. However, younger sophists were cynical of religions having any value beyond serving the interests of the elite, and thus rejected all religion out of hand. They viewed religion as a tool used by the aristocracy to impede the upward mobility of others and attempted to argue thus. B. Argument to persuade for personal gain rather than for the search for truth. What most distinguishes Philosophy from Sophistry are their goals. Both develop and use their critical thinking skills to the highest degree possible. But where Philosophy is first, and foremost, concerned with the search for Truth, the sophists used to their keen reason strictly for personal gain. Indeed, this is what they taught their students as the only appropriate use for reason. This should not be surprising since, as already noted, the sophists rejected any kind of objective standard, and thus Truth. Reason is viewed as merely one more tool to apply to furthering ones own ambitions and they would argue for any view that was advantageous at the moment. Indeed, the question of what views should be argued for is superfluous since it implies an objective standard of right and wrong. C. Fee for services education. Soccio seems to make much of this characteristic since the sophists are often considered the first to earn a living teaching. However, we should be careful about any praise we extend to them for being the first professional teachers. It is well-worth noting that although they did concern themselves with teaching their students what they know, we must keep in mind the nature of this particular mercantile education. Since there were no standards (nor could there be, given their relativist views) much of the knowledge and beliefs the sophists were paid to teach was political in nature and taylored to the desires of the student. That is, students were taught what they were willing to pay for, not what they ought to know. D. Concerns were pragmatic, rather than speculative. The sophists saw little or no value in knowledge for its own sake. If it could not be put to practical use there was no sense in teaching it or pursuing it. (Many of todays educrats seem to share this view! E. Egoism (look out for oneself at the expense of others) is taught as the proper ethics. Laws based on equality only benefit the weak. As the Gyges Ring Story suggests, most sophists reduce the issues of right and wrong to what can I get away with in a given situation. Thus there was a strong commitment to advancing ones social and political prominence in order to promote ones personal beliefs and desires. F. RelativistsMan is the measure of all things. This could lead to either culturalism or subjectivism. In chapter 5, The Wise Man: Socrates, Soccio presents a description of the person often credited with having pulled Philosophy down from the clouds; that is, Socrates applied his reason and judgment, not to questions about the nature of reality (although it seems clear that he held such opinions and derived his major social and moral views from them), but primarily to the question of what is the right way for human beings to live. Many of Socrates activities were directed toward exposing flaws in the beliefs and methods of many of the sophists who taught and practiced in Athens. The early dialogues of Plato such as The Apology, The Crito, The Phaedo, and The Euthyphro are usually considered fairly accurate accounts of Socrates activities and views, while the middle, e. g. , The Republic, and later, e. g. , The Laws, dialogues represent more and more of Platos own Philosophy. Although we only know Socrates through the dialogues of Plato and others, it seems clear that he disagreed with the sophists on most counts, and this eventually cost him his life. Platos accounts of Socrates life and activities are still enjoyable reading, both for Platos prose and Socrates method of question and answer to attempt clarification of complex concepts and beliefs (the Socratic method). Indeed, I have provided a link to a complete text of Platos Republic with a summary of much of the argument. The Apology is one of the best accounts of Socrates fundamental character and beliefs, as well as a great description of the business of Philosophy. Before going on to The Apology, please note some of Socrates fundamental beliefs and how they respond to those of the sophists. II. SocratesProper conduct based on reason. While the sophists experience and reason lead them to believe and promote cultural and ethical relativism, Socrates shows that reason actually demands an objective standard of social and personal conduct; the more one develops her reason, the more knowledge of Truth is acquired, and that knowledge inevitably leads to greater virtue. This view of the relation between virtue, knowledge, and Truth can be represented by the following five Socratic beliefs: A. Care for the soul above all else. The soul is the reasoning part of humans; and since reason is the only path to knowledge and Truth, the ultimate souces of value, development of the souls potential must be the central focus of our lives. While the variety of beliefs and values among cultures and individuals convinced the sophists that there are no objective values, Socrates argues that our ability to take note of such variation demands appeal to objective, rational standards. That is, as we observe and judge the beliefs and practices of others, that act seems to require a stable, rational soul that decides for itself which beliefs and practices to reject or pursue. On what other basis could we draw a judgment? B. Before we can care for the soul, we must understand it through careful self-examination of the souls function, which is virtue. Since reasoning implies judgment and judgment requires acquaintance with Truth to form its standard, analysis of the souls activity of reason implies the continued pursuit of this standard. Given the role it plays in cognition, according to Socrates, such a standard is what constitutes virtue. C. Virtue is knowledge. Being good is simply knowing the Good. (No room for weakness of will or character! ) That is, since the souls function is to be virtuous, and the virtue is the pursuit of Truth as our fundamental standard, the acquisition of knowledge just is doing good. Thus, morality is identified with knowing the Truth. One cannot know the Good and not act accordingly. If someone seems to acknowledge moral behavior but not behave morally, Socrates would suggest that that person merely parroted something they heard without truly understanding the nature of those moral statements. D. Doing evil only harms oneself (ones soul)see Platos Republic. Remember, the immaterial soul is the only avenue to Truth and virtue, and Truth and virtue are the fundamental values of human life. Any evil that someone might direct at another would only be manifested as physical behavior and thus not even touch the soul. However, the conscious decision to do evil to another requires ones soul to not pursue truth or virtue, and thus detract from the souls function. To detract from any function certainly seems to qualify as an evil. E. The principles of Good and Evil are above everything, even God(s); they are autonomous. Socrates was no atheist, but he does argue in The Euthyphro that the only rational understanding of the God(s) suggests that they appeal to the objective standards of Virtue, and indeed, it is their perfect consistency with those standards that makes them God(s) and so worth worshipping. The moral goodness of God continues to be an interesting Philosophical and Theological issue. Does God set the standard of morality or appeal to some standard? If God appeals to an external standard, might that suggest something above and superior to God? IV. Discussion Questionsconsider these for yourself. A. Would Socrates agree with the Sophists about religion? in what way? How might they differ? B. What is the best use of argument, to win personal gain or to find the truth? Why? C. Would you say the egoist/relativist ethics is more popular today, or Socrates ethics of absolute, universal principle? Which is better as a guide to conduct? Which is a better description of peoples behavior? D. Is there such a thing as doing good for the sake of doing good? (Would you be willing to sacrifice everything for one person, without anyone else ever knowing of your sacrifice? ) E. Is it enough to simply know the Good (what is the right thing to do), in order to do good?

Change in Protein function by Mutation

Question: Discuss about the Change in Protein function by Mutation? Answer: Proteins form a broad range of function that is mediated by the residues that make up the functional site. Mutations produce a dramatic effect in the active sites of the proteins and the binding pockets of the receptors (Mondai Hu, 2012). Mutation is associated with the conversion of a normal codon to a nonsense codon and thereby affects the protein function. According to Choi et al. (2012), a particular base change leads to a change in the sequencing of the amino acid. The important mutations that produce an impact on the protein sequences include: Frameshift mutation: Frameshift mutation causes an insertion and deletion of specific nucleotides. This leads to a disruption in the reading frame that causes an alteration in the protein structure. Nonsense mutation: It results in premature stop codon that leads to the formation of a nonfunctional protein product. Missense mutation: Point mutation causes a change in the sequence of DNA those results in single nucleotide change, which in turn causes a change in the sequencing of amino acids. As a result, the protein formed becomes non-functional. Neutral mutation: A Neutral mutation involves an amino acid codon that leads to the use of different but chemically similar amino acids. Silent mutations: Silent mutations remains associated with the change in the amino acid sequence in a way that the amino acid lies in same configuration with the original. References Choi, Y., Sims, G. E., Murphy, S., Miller, J. R., Chan, A. P. (2012). Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels.PloS one,7(10), e46688. Mondai, A. M., Hu, J. (2012, October). Mutation analysis of disease causing proteins. InBioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW), 2012 IEEE International Conference on(pp. 975-977). IEEE.

Arms Control Essays - Arms Control, Firearms, International Law

Arms Control Arms Control Arms control is a major issue facing the nations of the world today. The concept that a war today could destroy every living thing doesn't sit well with many people. So to control weapons and what nations have these weapons will help control war. With problems with Nuclear weapons, Biological, chemical, and small arms we need to control them to help curve the problem. There are five nuclear weapon states in the world. They are the United States, Russia, France, United Kingdom, and China. Currently there are no international laws banning nuclear weapons, but their bans on testing these weapons. There is a treaty to ban nuclear testing world wide, to establish inspections, and establish a network of monitoring stations to identify these situations (United Nations Handout). Thus far, not all forty-four of the countries with nuclear capabilities have signed, therefore making it null and void. Until we can come to agreement on this issue the issue of resolving the other weapons will be hard to come by. Chemical and biological weapons are the next item for the world to tackle. There are more than sixteen nations with these weapons. Some of which are Russia, India, China, and Israel. There is a Chemical Weapons Convention, which bans the use stockpile, development, production, and sale of these weapons. More than seventy nations have ratified it. There are five nations that have neither taken part in talks nor signed the agreement. They are Egypt, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, and Syria. The problem with controlling chemical weapons is that many of the agents that are used are used in everyday items. Phosphoric oxychloride, which is used in insecticides, gasoline additives and flame-retardants, is an item in question. These are items we must curtail to lessen or stop the threat of a chemical and biological war. The issue of land mines and small arms is a huge issue to tackle. For the simple reason that they are both easy to conceal. Land mines kill 800 people around the world a month. There about one hundred million active anti-personnel mines around the world in about seventy nations. This is a huge problem, because most of the people being killed are innocent people. The conflicts that they were used for have been over for years and either the military can't find them or don't have the capabilities to remove them. There has been a treaty submitted to more than one hundred nations for ratification, were there is a good chance that they will pass. It would make signers of the treaty to stop develop and deployment of anti-personnel mines. The United States has stated that they will not sign it, because we need them to protect American security. The problem with that is the area in question is along the North and South Korea border. So maybe we need to look at the broader picture and not at w hat we think is best for us. With the issue of small arms is that they are small and easy to conceal. They are fairly cheap and available. So the issue of small arms is a hard one to tackle, which may never be solved. In conclusion the issue of arms control is a hard one to tackle. Like life not everyone will be satisfied. We as a world must need to come to a general understanding of what we all need to do. Whether or not we recognize a nation as having weapons they are going have them regardless. We should limit what each country should have. That is as far as we should go. We can't stop anyone from doing anything. We can only hope to contain them. Social Issues

Stephen Truscott essays

Stephen Truscott essays During the summer of 1959 in Clinton, Ontario, a innocent teenage boy named Stephen Truscott was suddenly burdened to grow up in to a man in no time at all. Justice was not served in the Stephen Truscott case due to many key persons directly involved with investigation of the murder and rape of Lynne Harper such as the unprofessional conduct of the entire investigation by OPP inspector Graham and staff; the one-sided arguments imposed by Crown-Attorney and an the mishandling of medical evidence by an expert witness Dr. Peniston, the coroner. The Clinton OPP and Inspector Graham made many errors in the manner that they approached investigation of the murder of Lynn Harper, the police were guided by old laws and went on a one-way pursuit of a boy which they were determined to find guilty. It only took the police 24 hours after Lynne Harper's body was found to arrest Steven Truscott. No other suspects were ever brought up or seriously investigated but the OPP never even checked police records or military records for past sex offenders. Inspector. Graham had many records of evidence which could have easily placed Truscott else where than in Lawson's Bush but rejected those bits of evidence to advance his personal agenda and create advantages for himself. From the beginning of the episode in 1959, the OPP brought shame to the police force for their distasteful work as police officers by making a mockery of all that they had been taught about justice. Theirs efforts were distinctly positioned to make their pieces fit the puzzle. The Crown's counsel made grave errors in the method in trying to establish guilt on Truscott and the Judge's failure to appreciate that the route that the Crown was taking which was misleading to the jury and a fair trial. The Crown made sure that Truscott was viewed upon as a sex driven teenager and guided the jury with the improper use of evidence against the prisoner. ...

Analysis of a System, Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Analysis of a System, - Case Study Example The system of this kind is called transport intelligent systems. From the case study on the city highway, it was thought of as the stock of flowing traffic. Therefore, a stock is a foundation of every system (Meadows, 2008). Here the stocks are traffic flows, road, traffic lights, etc. because they can be measured, counted, and visible all the time. 1 Traffic flow variation on the scale of years or decade implies a reduction or an increase in the volume. For an increase in traffic flow means increase in the number of private vehicles amidst the public vehicles while the road network within the city remains constant. Within a decade, traffic flow can be reduced when the number of private vehicles is reduced and the number of public vehicles and increase and also increasing the road network within the city 2 Traffic flow can vary by day of week and/ hours of the day through creating many access ways to the city centre to reduce traffic congestion on the road. Traffic flow can be high on the working day of the week especially when there is a significant event taking place, for example, national celebrations such as Independence Day, etc. and on this day traffic flow become so high compared to any other days of the week. Traffic flow can in hours of the day, taking the morning hours (starting from 7:00 am to 8:30 am) when people are rushing to their work. At this time the traffic, volume is very high and reduces starting from 9:00 am when most people have reached their workplaces (Meadows, 2008). Then from 5:00 pm, the traffic flow starts increasing up to 7:00 pm when most people have reached their homes. 3 Traffic flow can vary with distance from the city due to presence of junction on the road; where there is a road junction at far distance from the road traffic diverts and leave the city centre with less traffic therefore leading to a reduction in traffic flow. Where there is a road